Month: October 2008

Montague’s First and Second Timothy, Titus

CCSS001

Thanks again to Baker Academic who provided a copy of George T. Montague, SM’s $amz(0801035813 First and Second Timothy, Titus); which is part of Baker’s new Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture series.

I’ve had a chance to poke around the book and must say I’m impressed. This commentary is designed to be used, and that’s refreshing. Here is a list, in no particular order, of some of the features of the print book. Read more

RBL Reviews Fiore’s Pastoral Epistles (Sacra Pagina)

 

This is Benjamin Fiore’s $amz(0814658148 The Pastoral Epistles) in the Sacra Pagina series. The review is available on RBL, of course. On authorship, Fiore thinks the Pastorals are pseudonymous, dated between 80-90 (largely because he sees the ecclesiology of the Pastorals as somewhere between so-called ‘genuine’ Paulines and Ignatius).

I’ve read Fiore’s introduction and parts of the commentary; overall it is good though is presuppositions do flavor the commentary. As with anything, it is best to read critically. Read more

Received: George T. Montague, SM; First and Second Timothy, Titus(Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture)


The good folks at Baker Academic have sent along a hot-off-the-presses copy of $amz(0801035813 First and Second Timothy, Titus), from the newly-commenced commentary series Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture. The text of the NAB (New American Bible) is provided in the commentary.


If you’re unfamiliar with the series, a video overview is available on the series web site.


There are excerpts from the book on Baker Academic’s web site (here, here and here); there is a 16-page discussion guide designed for “Personal Reflection or Small Group Study”. This is cool stuff; Baker should be commended for putting together the whole package on the book’s web page.


Most of the blurbs in the front matter and back cover are about the series, not the book. Here’s the book blurb from BakerAcademic.com:



George Montague offers a Catholic pastoral commentary on the letters to Timothy and Titus in the second volume in the Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (CCSS). He presents sound exegesis followed by reflection on the pastoral, theological, and practical applications of the text.


Here’s the blurb from $amz(0801035813 Amazon.com):



In the second volume of the Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture (CCSS), George Montague offers a Catholic pastoral commentary on the letters to Timothy and Titus, presenting sound exegesis followed by reflection on the pastoral, theological, and practical applications of the text. The CCSS offers readable, informative commentaries from the best of contemporary Catholic scholarship to help readers rediscover the Word of God as a living word in which God himself is present. Each commentary relates Scripture to life, is faithfully Catholic, and is supplemented by features designed to help readers understand the Bible more deeply and use it more effectively in teaching, preaching, evangelization, and other forms of ministry. This series is perfect for professional and lay leaders engaged in parish ministry, lay Catholics interested in serious Bible study, and Catholic students.


Yeah, pretty much the same thing though the Amazon.com blurb works in the series description as well.


Here’s the table of contents:



Illustrations
Editor’s Preface
Abbreviations
Introduction to the Pastoral Letters


The First Letter to Timothy
Timothy’s First Charge (1 Timothy 1)
Liturgy and Conduct (1 Timothy 2)
Qualifications of Ministers (1 Timothy 3)
False Teaching and Advice to Timothy (1 Timothy 4)
Rules for Different Groups (1 Timothy 5)
Final Directives: Slaves, Truth, Riches (1 Timothy 6)


The Second Letter to Timothy
Timothy’s Gifts and Paul’s Lot (2 Timothy 1)
Counsels to Timothy (2 Timothy 2)
Meeting the Challenges of the Last Days (2 Timothy 3)
Final Charge to Timothy and Paul’s Faith amid His Loneliness (2 Timothy 4)


The Letter to Titus
Organizing the Church in Crete (Titus 1)
Virtues for Different States of Life (Titus 2)
How We Should Live—and Why (Titus 3)


Suggested Resources
Glossary
Index of Pastoral Topics
Index of Sidebars
Map


I have not had a chance to read the book yet. I will say it was designed well. And it is one of the few commentaries that I have seen that actually has pictures (black & white photos) of different areas or artifacts relevant to the discussion. That’s pretty cool.


I couldn’t contain myself, however, and peeked to see how 1Ti 1.20 is handled. You know:



18 This charge I entrust to you, Timothy, my child, in accordance with the prophecies previously made about you, that by them you may wage the good warfare,  19 holding faith and a good conscience. By rejecting this, some have made shipwreck of their faith,  20 among whom are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme. (1Ti 1.18-20, ESV)


I’ve never checked an explicitly Catholic commentary on this verse and wanted to see how the verse was related to excommunication. Well, it is directly and equivalently related: “These two Paul handed over to Satan, a technical term for excommunication.” (Montague 47, emphasis his). That doesn’t surprise me, and it doesn’t seem altogether wrong to me either. These guys were given the right boot of fellowship. It’s just that ‘protestant’ commentaries rarely ever cross the line and call it excommunication. The goal isn’t separation, the eventual goal is reconciliation, as Montague aptly concludes.


I’m looking forward to giving this one the once-over. Thanks, Baker Academic!

Towner on Christology in the PE

I have just recently read Phil Towner’s “Christology in the Letters to Timothy and Titus” in Contours of Christology in the New Testament, edited by Richard Longenecker (Eerdmans, 2005).Towner discusses the key Christological passages in the three letters interacting with recent scholarship and synthesizing the Christology found in each letter.It is the sort of careful work we have come to expect from Towner and, therefore, is a good entry way into this area of study.Towner continues (rightly I believe) to stress the fact that, while these letters have some significant commonality, they also have their distinct emphases.


Though I agree with most of the essay, for the sake of conversation I will here point out two smaller things I question.The first has to do with discerning the background of some of the Christological language.Discussing the “epiphany” language, Towner asserts,


Undoubtedly … epiphany language must have been deliberately chosen to engage the dominant religious-political discourse of the day and to force a rethinking of these categories by the proclamation of God’s story in Hellenistic dress.” (225; emphasis mine)


I think this may be overstated.Since, as Towner notes, this language appears in the Septuagint describing “Yahweh’s interventions in the world” then the use in the PE could arise for a number of reasons.Towner mentions emperor worship elsewhere so I wonder if that is what he has in mind here.I am not convinced that emperor worship is in view.I want to be cautious when trying to establish specific background connections.


Secondly, Towner refers to Timothy’s “dwindling courage and lagging commitment” in 2 Timothy (238).This is a common assertion, but I think it reads too much into 2 Timothy 1.Simply because Paul calls on him to stir up his gift (1:6) does not mean he is failing.The fact that Paul exhorts him not to be timid (1:6) or ashamed (1:8) does not mean that he is being these things.It is, rather, what is to be expected by a father figure as he exhorts his “son” to face hardship well.Paul is simply exhorting Timothy to “strap it on”, wade into the fray and take his lumps in the “good fight.”The similarities between this letter and letters from commanding officers to their subordinates would seem to support my reading as well.


These are not major points in Towner’s essay, and as I noted the essay as a whole is very profitable.These two points are ones I see in other essays so I raise my critique here to see if a profitable discussion might be raised.